Ligue A Masculine 12/13

Competition

Ligue A Masculine 12/13 Best players OPPOSITE
JoueursJouésServeServeBLKBLKAttaqueAttaqueRanking
  MS#=/TotSv ind.Sv ind.#=/TotBl ind.Bl ind.#=/TotSp ind.Sp ind.Index

1

KONECNY David
(TOURS VOLLEY-BALL)

13

47

20

54

12

182

0,0154

0,0154

25

27

3

92

0,012

0,012

181

33

26

388

14,7784

14,7784

0,47558

2

PATAK Evan
(TOAC-TUC VB)

1

4

3

4

0

13

0,0165

0,0165

2

0

0

4

0,011

0,011

18

4

4

42

0,9524

0,9524

0,40844

3

RABILLER Stanislas
(ARAGO SETE VOLLEY BALL)

1

4

1

3

1

14

0,0112

0,0112

3

1

0

4

0,0168

0,0168

6

1

3

18

0,4444

0,4444

0,40839

4

FALASCA Guillermo
(NARBONNE VOLLEY)

5

20

18

16

1

93

0,0212

0,0212

3

11

0

19

0,0033

0,0033

82

18

25

190

4,1053

4,1053

0,40717

5

MOREAU Marien
(AS CANNES VOLLEY-BALL)

4

17

11

7

4

67

0,021

0,021

3

1

0

9

0,0042

0,0042

39

21

10

111

1,2252

1,2252

0,39692

6

HUDECEK Ondrej
(BEAUVAIS OISE UC)

1

4

1

4

1

13

0,0108

0,0108

1

3

0

4

0,0054

0,0054

19

1

8

37

1,0811

1,0811

0,34657

7

OIVANEN Mikko
(PARIS VOLLEY)

4

13

3

10

2

45

0,0087

0,0087

3

7

0

14

0,0052

0,0052

44

9

16

112

2,2054

2,2054

0,33929

8

TALIA Maoni
(GFCO AJACCIO VB)

1

5

1

2

0

18

0,0049

0,0049

2

2

0

6

0,0099

0,0099

11

4

5

36

0,2778

0,2778

0,33513

9

CLARK Carson
(MONTPELLIER VOLLEY UC)

3

12

2

8

1

37

0,0056

0,0056

3

6

0

9

0,0056

0,0056

46

14

3

101

3,4455

3,4455

0,33027

10

NOVOTNY Marek
(GFCO AJACCIO VB)

1

4

2

3

0

18

0,0107

0,0107

0

1

0

1

0

0

22

4

6

41

1,1707

1,1707

0,31811

11

DAMIAO Alex
(TOAC-TUC VB)

1

4

0

2

0

15

0

0

2

0

0

2

0,0103

0,0103

17

0

3

33

1,697

1,697

0,31798

12

KROLIS Humphrey
(PARIS VOLLEY)

1

4

1

3

1

16

0,0109

0,0109

0

2

0

2

0

0

10

4

5

30

0,1333

0,1333

0,31485

13

LAMOISE Thomas
(RENNES VOLLEY 35)

3

10

0

5

2

28

0,0043

0,0043

2

3

0

7

0,0043

0,0043

41

9

7

93

2,6882

2,6882

0,31419

14

MISTOCO Junot
(ARAGO SETE VOLLEY BALL)

1

5

1

4

0

15

0,0046

0,0046

1

6

0

7

0,0046

0,0046

16

4

5

31

1,129

1,129

0,30997

15

VENNO Oliver
(RENNES VOLLEY 35)

2

6

1

6

0

24

0,0031

0,0031

2

0

0

2

0,0062

0,0062

18

7

9

46

0,2609

0,2609

0,30724

16

BRAGA DA SILVA Marcelo José
(NARBONNE VOLLEY)

3

7

0

0

2

17

0,0037

0,0037

0

1

0

4

0

0

16

0

2

27

3,6296

3,6296

0,29345

17

PEREZ Iban
(NANTES REZE METROPOLE V)

1

4

0

5

1

15

0,0057

0,0057

0

3

0

6

0

0

15

3

4

36

0,8889

0,8889

0,29186

18

BENCZ Milan
(ARAGO SETE VOLLEY BALL)

2

5

2

3

0

14

0,005

0,005

0

1

0

5

0

0

21

6

8

47

0,7447

0,7447

0,28754

19

CORTEGGIANI Jordan
(MONTPELLIER VOLLEY UC)

1

1

0

1

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

8

0,375

0,375

0,26264

20

VIVIER Pierre
(NARBONNE VOLLEY)

1

4

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

2

4

4

0,2612

21

MARTINEZ Ricardo
(GFCO AJACCIO VB)

1

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

-2

-2

0,2612

Calcul du classement

Pointu

Le classement prend en compte :

  • Serve Index (Sv ind.): positive serves divided the total points of both teams (ranking is available only if the player has made at least one serve per set)

  • Attack Index (Sp ind.): positive attacks minus negative attacks divided the total attacks (ranking is available only if the player has made at least three attacks per set)

  • Block Index (Bl ind.): positive blocks divided the total points of both teams

The final ranking is based on the final “index” which determines the impact of the role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability. This final Index is calculated considering the indexes for each single skill (“ind.” columns) and a coefficient which indicates the “importance” of the role to determine the probability of success for the team. Each single skill index is calculated considering the positive and negative skills based on the number of points played from the teams and multiplied for a coefficient which indicates the importance of the skill for that role to determine the probability of success for the team. The icons next to each skill column give an idea about the “weight” of the skill determining the probability of success for the team in this role. The final Index is calculated also considering the following criteria:

  • Minimum number of Serves per set:  1

  • Minimum number of Spikes per set:  3

Serve

  • # serve ace

  • / half point

  • = serve error

Attaque

  • # point

  • / blocked

  • = error

BLK

  • # point

  • / invasion

  • = hand out

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1