Marmara SpikeLigue

Saison Régulière

Marmara SpikeLigue Best players OPPOSITE
JoueursJouésServeServeBLKBLKAttaqueAttaqueRanking
  MS#=/TotSv ind.Sv ind.#=/TotBl ind.Bl ind.#=/TotSp ind.Sp ind.Index

1

HIRSCH Simon
(NICE VOLLEY BALL)

8

29

12

27

4

110

0,0123

0,0123

19

19

2

61

0,0146

0,0146

127

15

27

271

9,0959

9,0959

0,44478

2

KOUKARTSEV Pablo
(SAEMS TOURCOING VOLLEY-BALL LILLE METROPOLE)

9

34

7

15

9

129

0,0105

0,0105

18

26

1

66

0,0118

0,0118

138

16

24

298

11,1812

11,1812

0,4277

3

HAIKAL Reda
(AS CANNES)

7

25

9

29

9

108

0,0159

0,0159

9

11

0

23

0,0079

0,0079

87

20

8

177

8,3333

8,3333

0,42296

4

NIKOLIC Dusan
(ALTERNA STADE POITEVIN VOLLEY-BALL PRO)

9

32

11

34

5

129

0,0105

0,0105

14

25

0

59

0,0092

0,0092

114

13

18

218

12,1835

12,1835

0,41795

5

DIMITROV Dimitar
(MONTPELLIER HERAULT SPORTING CLUB VOLLEY)

9

28

8

27

10

119

0,0127

0,0127

10

14

1

48

0,0071

0,0071

110

13

25

213

9,4648

9,4648

0,40516

6

LINDQVIST Veikka
(MONTPELLIER HERAULT SPORTING CLUB VOLLEY)

2

5

3

5

1

17

0,0132

0,0132

3

3

0

9

0,0099

0,0099

17

2

2

29

2,2414

2,2414

0,38975

7

TOLEDO Pierre
(CHAUMONT VOLLEY-BALL 52 HAUTE-MARNE)

8

28

12

28

4

104

0,0121

0,0121

6

27

1

49

0,0045

0,0045

91

10

22

187

8,8342

8,8342

0,38431

8

FERAL Nathan
(SPACER'S TOULOUSE VOLLEY)

8

31

15

22

2

76

0,0115

0,0115

4

7

1

22

0,0027

0,0027

67

5

18

120

11,3667

11,3667

0,38298

9

MUJANOVIC Nik
(PARIS VOLLEY)

8

28

4

29

2

104

0,0046

0,0046

13

20

1

47

0,0099

0,0099

147

23

26

310

8,8516

8,8516

0,37239

10

PLATACS Kristaps
(PLESSIS-ROBINSON VOLLEY-BALL)

7

25

6

20

3

72

0,0077

0,0077

5

19

0

39

0,0043

0,0043

76

17

19

164

6,0976

6,0976

0,34606

11

SCHOUTEN CASEY
(NARBONNE VOLLEY)

5

19

5

9

3

69

0,0096

0,0096

1

19

0

26

0,0012

0,0012

81

14

10

152

7,125

7,125

0,34491

12

SCHLIENGER Tristan
(ARAGO DE SETE VB)

8

21

5

14

3

71

0,0058

0,0058

5

7

1

20

0,0036

0,0036

71

13

14

126

7,3333

7,3333

0,338

13

LEON Henri
(SAINT-NAZAIRE VOLLEY-BALL ATLANTIQUE )

8

24

3

10

1

54

0,0028

0,0028

6

7

0

31

0,0042

0,0042

77

8

17

153

8,1569

8,1569

0,32896

14

CANHAM Jordan
(SAINT-NAZAIRE VOLLEY-BALL ATLANTIQUE )

8

22

4

21

3

53

0,0049

0,0049

5

14

0

28

0,0035

0,0035

36

7

8

97

4,7629

4,7629

0,32145

15

CARDIN Célestin
(ARAGO DE SETE VB)

5

15

0

9

3

43

0,0034

0,0034

2

11

0

22

0,0023

0,0023

42

6

10

95

4,1053

4,1053

0,30512

16

WINKELMULLER Julien
(SPACER'S TOULOUSE VOLLEY)

7

23

1

8

3

62

0,003

0,003

0

10

1

35

0

0

77

9

18

160

7,1875

7,1875

0,30462

17

NIKULA Aaro
(NARBONNE VOLLEY)

7

19

2

2

2

24

0,0034

0,0034

1

6

0

13

0,0009

0,0009

25

7

7

59

3,5424

3,5424

0,29563

18

SCLATER Ryan
(TOURS VOLLEY-BALL)

2

3

1

1

0

7

0,0033

0,0033

0

1

0

2

0

0

1

3

1

6

-1,5

-1,5

0,27671

19

FAGANAS Julien
(TOURS VOLLEY-BALL)

5

10

0

4

1

13

0,0012

0,0012

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

4

0

19

-0,5263

-0,5263

0,26651

20

BYAM Christopher
(ALTERNA STADE POITEVIN VOLLEY-BALL PRO)

5

10

0

5

0

14

0

0

1

1

0

8

0,0012

0,0012

14

2

1

29

3,7931

3,7931

0,2665

21

DIOP Cheikh
(CHAUMONT VOLLEY-BALL 52 HAUTE-MARNE)

5

6

0

4

0

10

0

0

0

1

0

3

0

0

6

0

1

14

2,1429

2,1429

0,2612

22

NAMBOUE Check-Ethan
(NICE VOLLEY BALL)

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0,2612

Calcul du classement

Pointu

Le classement prend en compte :

  • Serve Index (Sv ind.): positive serves divided the total points of both teams (ranking is available only if the player has made at least one serve per set)

  • Attack Index (Sp ind.): positive attacks minus negative attacks divided the total attacks (ranking is available only if the player has made at least three attacks per set)

  • Block Index (Bl ind.): positive blocks divided the total points of both teams

The final ranking is based on the final “index” which determines the impact of the role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability. This final Index is calculated considering the indexes for each single skill (“ind.” columns) and a coefficient which indicates the “importance” of the role to determine the probability of success for the team. Each single skill index is calculated considering the positive and negative skills based on the number of points played from the teams and multiplied for a coefficient which indicates the importance of the skill for that role to determine the probability of success for the team. The icons next to each skill column give an idea about the “weight” of the skill determining the probability of success for the team in this role. The final Index is calculated also considering the following criteria:

  • Minimum number of Serves per set:  1

  • Minimum number of Spikes per set:  3

Serve

  • # serve ace

  • / half point

  • = serve error

Attaque

  • # point

  • / blocked

  • = error

BLK

  • # point

  • / invasion

  • = hand out

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1